Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rev. Gabriel Strawn's avatar

I was just wondering aloud, commiserating perhaps, with one of my members the other day up here in Maine. Is there some special reason that the Lutheran congregations (all 3 of them) up here can't get a little help financially? Seems like money can go elsewhere to get new church buildings/school buildings/etc. I don't know. Just wondering aloud again. I'll always appreciate when you put a spotlight on the LCMS in Maine (selfishly perhaps, as the only non-retired LCMS pastor in the state at the moment). I advised the congregations up north recently to only call guys who are willing to go overseas, because that's what's required to get a guy to come up here.

m whitener's avatar

Dr. Wood, sir. First, what an excellent publication you have here. Thank you.

I have only read a few lines, so I will only comment on a few lines. If you made opposite points down the page, then I am a dummy again.

Demographic crisis. I don't get it. The Missouri Synod didn't cause this mass insanity and falling away. They will come in in hoards when their foolishness comes home to roost by way of disaster, famine or war here. I do not have any information that God intends this church body to be growing in numbers right now. Everything I can think of right now says otherwise. Preach law properly, which is a thing missing, and expect it to get a lot worse. The Lord can do otherwise, but He does not promise, does He? So the synod shrinks a lot. Get the change agents out, the ones that actually have the sincerity to leave, and it gets even worse. To every thing, there is a season.

Geriatric candidates. We want wisdom and experience. What is possibly gained with less of that? Shortcomings in these two candidates are not about their age or vitality.

Every pastor knows not to unnecessarily alienate members of his flock. Harrison was and is a pastor. No layman, including me, really understands this in a completely internalized way. I think Harrison does not want to lose a single sheep, and that is nothing but good. So he is careful not to create unneeded offense, therefore the perception that he isn't doing anything about the problems. He does have many achievements in bringing our church body back to health. He is a theologian and a pastor. You imply some place that the two are barely distinguishable. I think that is way wrong. The other candidate had no such pastoral resume, and made a big and controversial (divisive) error (an academic one yet!) in a badly done publication that wasn't just a blog post or something, but the LC itself. I don't see how it's possible to downplay that.

Thanks for your great publication, but the first few lines of this article are wrong.

56 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?