Discussion about this post

User's avatar
J. Riley Corrigan's avatar

The reinstitution of the commission on worship concerns me quite a bit. Anecdotally, my congregation has still not fully recovered from the transition from TLH to LSB. The liturgical habits of the laypeople have been disrupted. This is not a condemnation of one or another, but an observation that major changes create confusion and divide generations. If the commission exists to promote and perpetuate the best of what we already have then I am all for it.

I am curious, is there any indication as to the composition of the commission and what we should expect from their work?

Carl Vehse's avatar

Following the motions for Omnibus A and Omnibus B, there were approximately ten amendments offered to pull one or another overture out of the omnibus resolution Some of these overtures were conservative in nature, others liberal, and others neither. It was pointed out by the parlimentarian that no discussion was allowed for such motions. Each individual motion was then defeated by a 4-to-1 to 3-to1 margin. Finally, for each omnibus resolution, someone called the question and there was a chorus of "Second"s.

The prevailing mood among the delegates appear to be one of avoiding adding more resolutions to the agenda. There was even a call to shorten the number of seconds a delegate was allowed to press the button to vote, which Chairman Harrison said would be done in the following days.

9 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?