LCMS Convention Admonition of AALC Provokes a Reaction That Proves The Point

Missouri called the AALC to honor fellowship and adopted it by nearly 90 percent. Within hours, Rev.Dr. Jordan Cooper's fury proved the resolution's point.

There were more fireworks during a surprisingly active and restless fourth day of this year’s Regular Convention of the LCMS. The delegates adopted Resolution 5-15A, which admonishes The American Association of Lutheran Churches (AALC) to honor its fellowship with the LCMS and to settle the clergy and congregations it has received from the Synod without first resolving their cases, by a majority reported near 90 percent. Within a few hours, the AALC pastor and theologian Rev. Dr. Jordan Cooper rejoined with fury on X, and when fellow Lutherans asked him to stop, he refused. The reaction was a live demonstration of the thing that had forced the matter onto the floor in the first place, since a dispute that might have stayed inside a committee had already been driven into public view by video and post.

What the resolution asks

Presented by Rev. Dr. Roland Ziegler of Concordia Theological Seminary in Fort Wayne, Resolution 5-15A is an admonition aimed at keeping fellowship rather than ending it. It calls on the AALC to honor the fellowship it holds with the LCMS and to rectify the situation of pastors and congregations it received after they left Missouri without resolving disputes at issue. The Resolution also directs the Secretary of the Synod to compile a list of such clergy for the district presidents; it asks the President to continue what the floor amended from “informal” to “reconciliatory” dialogue; and it has the President report to the 2029 convention whether unity in doctrine and practice remains or whether the basis for fellowship no longer exists. Rev. Dr. John Bussman, a Southern District advisory delegate on the Board of Directors, framed it as a resolution that “could actually move toward increased dialogue” over the next three years rather than toward the end of fellowship.

The dispute did not arrive on the floor out of the blue. Ad Crucem News has tracked it since the AALC’s hour-long video reply to the underlying overture, and reported on the longer record that showed an AALC that is, on paper, committed to fellowship in faith and life . That is the irony Bussman named out loud: what moved a quiet overture toward a floor admonition was, in his words, the “subsequent posts and videos online,” which he judged “problematic, more than that.” The online argument did not merely accompany the dispute. It escalated it.

A somewhat divided floor

The near-ninety-percent margin conceals a real argument. Committee 5 accepted one friendly change, inserting the reconciliation language the Rev. Brian Johnston of the Central Illinois District asked for, and then rejected two amendments that went to the heart of the matter. The Rev. Bradley Urlaub of the Eastern District moved to replace the resolution’s “according to LCMS bylaws” standard with “a mutually accountable process that honors the ecclesiastical judgments and responsibilities of both church bodies,” on the ground that the AALC is a separate church body the LCMS cannot bind to its own procedure; the Rev. Philip Zielinski of Ohio and Rev. Sean Kilgo of Kansas answered that the clause governs the departed clergy rather than the AALC itself and that binding the Synod to the AALC’s judgments would set a dangerous precedent, so the amendment failed. Rev. Eric Phillips of the Mid-South District then moved to soften the central resolve to ask the AALC “to work in good faith to rectify” the cases.

The dissent was not only procedural. The Rev. Kurt Laskowsky of South Dakota argued the whole approach mistook a failure of communication for a breach of confession, that calling the AALC to repentance without confessing the Synod’s own part in the miscommunication was not the way of Matthew 18, and that it would “drive a wedge between us further.” A Mid-South delegate, invoking the joy of the week’s hoped-for rapprochement with the Wisconsin Synod, warned that the AALC is the Synod’s only national fellowship and urged a more formalized process for the sake of future fellowship with the WELS and the ELS. Against them, the Rev. Charles Lehmann of the Southern District made the committee’s case in its hardest form: the breach of good faith “already exists,” because the AALC received rostered workers without first resolving their standing and so violated the protocol under which fellowship was established. The floor sided with the committee, but not before airing, at length and by name, the case that the admonition was possibly premature.

The reaction

The vote landed, and Rev. Dr. Jordan Cooper detonated. Cooper is not a bystander to this dispute. He is an ordained AALC pastor, professor at the American Lutheran Theological Seminary (ALS), and the executive director of the Just and Sinner ministry, with a podcast and a YouTube following in the tens of thousands, and the resolution reaches his own church body and his own standing directly. In a series of posts on X on Wednesday afternoon, he wrote that the resolution had been “adopted by 90%” and added, “Was nice while it lasted LCMS.” Asked by a reader what happens now, he answered that he would “plant a church, as I am currently attending an LCMS congregation.” He noted that he had deleted an earlier post “because some people thought it was going to make matters worse,” and then added, “I stand by everything I said.”

What followed is the part that bears on the resolution. Fellow Lutherans asked him to stand down. Rev. Hans Fiene told him simply, “Dude, stop.” Cooper replied, “Absolutely not.” When another reader pleaded with him not to throw away fellowship “when it is not yet lost,” warning that the posting amounted at best to “screaming into the void” and at worst to cyberbullying, Cooper answered, “Cyberbullying? Are you kidding me?” The substance of his grievance is not eccentric, but the difference is entirely in the method, and the method is the point.

The reaction is the whole story

A resolution that asks a partner church to settle a quarrel quietly and to report progress in three years is an unlikely candidate for a viral afternoon. It became one because the medium in which this fellowship dispute now generally lives is the same medium that pulls the ripcord on restraint. The delegates who voted yes were told that the online activity around the AALC dispute had made a manageable disagreement unmanageable. Within hours of their vote, the most prominent AALC voice supplied the confirmation, refusing the counsel of a fellow pastor to stop and treating a plea for restraint as an insult.

The tragedy in it is that nearly everyone involved says the same thing they want. The committee says it wants reconciliation, the floor dissenters say they want fellowship preserved, this publication’s own reading of the historical record found an AALC that professes commitment to fellowship, and Cooper, underneath the defiance, is protesting the possible loss of a fellowship he values enough to be furious about. The resolution gives the President three years and a mandate to save it. The afternoon that followed is a fair measure of how much harder the loudest voices, on every side, will make any possible agreement with reconciliation.

• Correction: an earlier version of this story identified Rev. Dr. Cooper as President of the American Lutheran Theological Seminary (ALS). He is a professor. We apologize for the error.

---

Method and source. The account of the debate and the quotations from the floor are transcribed from the convention proceedings of the Wednesday, July 22, 2026 session; speaker attributions by district are drawn from the same transcript and remain provisional until the official minutes are published. Rev. Dr. Jordan Cooper’s statements are quoted from his public posts on X of July 22, 2026, as are the replies of Rev. Hans Fiene and others. The disposition and the reported margin are recorded on this publication’s decisions log , with the text of Resolution 5-15 from Today’s Business; the reported ninety-percent figure is provisional pending the official Resolution Action Report. Background on the fellowship dispute is in this publication’s earlier coverage of the AALC’s video reply and the record of its fellowship commitments . Ad Crucem News is an independent publication; this analysis is editorial and carries no imprimatur of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod or its officers.