It was said in writing, but we won't name the person because the point is not to take him to task, but rather to address a teaching deficiency, which was also echoed by several people responding to an article about fecundity in the LCMS.
So true - you validate my point. Charlie Kirk is not a saint. Was he used by God? Perhaps. This doesn't make him a saint or a donkey. Sainted because... ??
It was said in writing, but we won't name the person because the point is not to take him to task, but rather to address a teaching deficiency, which was also echoed by several people responding to an article about fecundity in the LCMS.
"...the sainted Charlie Kirk..." ?! Seriously... ? The Zionist did say some worthwhile things, but then even a broken clock is right twice a day.
The Lord God in Heaven once used a donkey to shame a prophet, and then had it recorded for all time.
So true - you validate my point. Charlie Kirk is not a saint. Was he used by God? Perhaps. This doesn't make him a saint or a donkey. Sainted because... ??
Sainted because he was and is a Christian.
A given, but context is poor - it elevates him which was clearly intentional.
What was he “intentionally” elevated to?
If anything, it is the reverse, particularly when most modern Christians view Matthew 28:19 as a call for foreign missions.