Perhaps this would be an excellent time for David Behnke to offer some insight, particularly using the "Lutheran resolution template" he mentioned when responding to my post the other day at AC. If any who know the former president see this, let him know.
I'm with those waiting for a Missouri Synod liberal to accept the editor's challenge. In the meantime, daily baptismal repentance and renewal will have to do. May a heaping plate of Advent II metanoia be on the plate of all readers who are headed ad crucem.
Why would anyone "take up the cause?" The article is a set-up right from the title forward. And it's cloaked, i.e. obviously not written by Tim Wood. "Come one, come all ye liberals as I understand the term liberal, take me on." Although I won't reveal who I am. Weak. And adolescent. WOT - waste of time. Blessed Advent II.
He came to my attention by bloviating on our X feed this week. So I went to winsome guy’s feed, and lo and behold, he has strong opinions about the issue. Given those opinions and his rank, he is a perfect candidate to represent what he finds so heinous, as are you.
This is the third false accusation you have launched regarding this story.
I am going to make it simple: I will publish any defense of OSLCS and Harmon. I will publish any criticism of Ad Crucem News in this matter. You may frame it any way you like. The authors may even use pseudonyms.
Are these the same old liberals from the Seminex days? If so they quite elderly now. Or is there a new generation of young progressives eager to corrupt the faith once handed down to the saints.
Excellent questions! I hope at least one liberal Lutheran answers these. I’m very interested to see how they view these sort of things.
Also, how did Kloha and the others handle the following church service?
I’m interested to know how they handled that service, as well!
Hi Pastor Rojas, here's the link to the streamed service from the First Sunday of Advent: https://www.facebook.com/OurSaviorChurchVA/videos
Also a nice audible fractio panis during Kloha's verba. A man who served as a seminary professor for years should know better.
Hope to see a response to this although I doubt it will occur.
Perhaps this would be an excellent time for David Behnke to offer some insight, particularly using the "Lutheran resolution template" he mentioned when responding to my post the other day at AC. If any who know the former president see this, let him know.
Ah!! Kloha. Say no more…😔
It will be instructive to see if some "Conservative" gatekeepers chime in to tell us how this request causes hurt feelings.
Indeed. I’m sure we are going to hear about squeaky wheels being horribly disruptive to a glacial pace of resolution.
This is what happens when antinomian preaching and teaching is tolerated by a congregation.
I'm with those waiting for a Missouri Synod liberal to accept the editor's challenge. In the meantime, daily baptismal repentance and renewal will have to do. May a heaping plate of Advent II metanoia be on the plate of all readers who are headed ad crucem.
Maybe Staneck will take up the cause? He has firm opinions on the “kerfuffle”.
Why would anyone "take up the cause?" The article is a set-up right from the title forward. And it's cloaked, i.e. obviously not written by Tim Wood. "Come one, come all ye liberals as I understand the term liberal, take me on." Although I won't reveal who I am. Weak. And adolescent. WOT - waste of time. Blessed Advent II.
1. What is the set up?
2. You are bearing false witness. Only Tim wrote this.
Tim knows someone named Staneck? If so, pardon me.
He came to my attention by bloviating on our X feed this week. So I went to winsome guy’s feed, and lo and behold, he has strong opinions about the issue. Given those opinions and his rank, he is a perfect candidate to represent what he finds so heinous, as are you.
This is the third false accusation you have launched regarding this story.
How do you call yourself a Reverend?
I am going to make it simple: I will publish any defense of OSLCS and Harmon. I will publish any criticism of Ad Crucem News in this matter. You may frame it any way you like. The authors may even use pseudonyms.
Are these the same old liberals from the Seminex days? If so they quite elderly now. Or is there a new generation of young progressives eager to corrupt the faith once handed down to the saints.
It’s a combination of men who stayed on after receiving higher critical training, and youngsters soaked in a Barthian / Progressive fusion.