How about the moral objection of the COVID injections being a complete scam that helped no one and harmed many? Or all vaccinations being a harmful scam, apart from the fact that they're sorceries derived from the slaughter of children?
If no babies were ever involved in any injections, COVID-related or not, vaccines wouldn't be any more ethical. The fact that children are involved just makes the lack of objection ridiculous, but it's also naive to excuse oneself from the burden of ethical discernment just because some company participates in the deception of modern pharmacy sans sacrificed babies.
Thank you, Ian. Your response helps to show how muddied the waters have become on these topics.
Without speaking on Dr. Ristau's behalf, there are two helpful ways to think about these things:
1. Are we providing enough information about these products and their research provenance? This is not to bind consciences, but to allow the people to make properly informed decisions.
2. There is a tendency to believe that the ends justify the means - if just one life is saved by a medication, even if the research was gruesome, then we take it. However, should we accept any medication or treatment that involved murder and suffering, even if it will now save a life? For example, should we use any positive research results from Japan's Unit 731? I would certainly decline any life saving treatment that originated from that experimentation.
How about the moral objection of the COVID injections being a complete scam that helped no one and harmed many? Or all vaccinations being a harmful scam, apart from the fact that they're sorceries derived from the slaughter of children?
If no babies were ever involved in any injections, COVID-related or not, vaccines wouldn't be any more ethical. The fact that children are involved just makes the lack of objection ridiculous, but it's also naive to excuse oneself from the burden of ethical discernment just because some company participates in the deception of modern pharmacy sans sacrificed babies.
I have published thoughts on this article. https://lflc.substack.com/p/cannibalism-clot-shots-covid-and?sd=pf
Thank you, Ian. Your response helps to show how muddied the waters have become on these topics.
Without speaking on Dr. Ristau's behalf, there are two helpful ways to think about these things:
1. Are we providing enough information about these products and their research provenance? This is not to bind consciences, but to allow the people to make properly informed decisions.
2. There is a tendency to believe that the ends justify the means - if just one life is saved by a medication, even if the research was gruesome, then we take it. However, should we accept any medication or treatment that involved murder and suffering, even if it will now save a life? For example, should we use any positive research results from Japan's Unit 731? I would certainly decline any life saving treatment that originated from that experimentation.