Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Philip's avatar

The implicit suggestion there is deeply troubling: that we should reject the Lutheran (and Scriptural) Two Kingdoms view. We know that in this world, sometimes evil needs to be opposed by force by those who hold the vocations to do that. Luther writes that it's for good reason that civil authorities bear a sword, not a bouquet of roses, to do their job. But that is not the vocation of a pastor!

Some of the best fiction is the most provocative and ambiguous. A violently transgressive pastor that then wrestles with his sin, with grace, and ultimately comes to repentance could be pretty powerful. A pastoral version of Crime and Punishment, if you will. But if his vigilantism and violence are celebrated, rather than repented, that is highly problematic and a very anti-Scriptural picture of what pastoral ministry means.

Mel's avatar

I do think the sequel actually is supposed to get into more of the main character’s own moral dilemma as Thoma pointed to this in a Facebook post. I loved it as a quality form of entertainment that was thought-provoking. It is, of course, just that and I’d caution people against creating meaning that isn’t necessarily in the text itself. It is just worth noting that the “something to be desired” may soon be addressed as I’m fairly certain he is working on a sequel. And a movie I cannot wait to see. The story reminded me a lot of Lee Child Reacher stories.

No posts

Ready for more?